Statistics Help
Question: Consider the private value auction model, with n bidders. Each bidder’s value is drawn independently from .
(a) Suppose the seller runs a second-price auction. What is the expected selling price, and the expected valuation of the winning bidder? Edit
Answer: The minimum length chain for Θ−i does not contain a downward link followed by an upward link. Proof. Suppose it does contain such a sequence. Then, some bidder i1 moved from slot i1 to slot i2 > i1, and bidder i2 moved from slot i2 to a slot i3 < i2. An alternate solution, and thus a candidate solution for Θ−i is to have bidder i1 move from slot i1 to slot i3, have bidder i2 remain in slot i2, and keep everything else the same. (Bidder i1 can move to slot i3 since i3 < i2 and i2 is in range for bidder i1 (by the fact that i1 moved to i2 in Θ−i).) The difference between the two solutions is ci2 (vi2 − vi1 ) + ci3 (vi1 − vi2 ) = (ci3 −ci2 )(vi1 −vi2 ). We know ci3 > ci2 since i3 < i2. We also know vi1 ≥ vi2 since otherwise Θ could switch bidders i1 and i2 (note again that bidder i1 can move to slot i2, since it did so in Θ−i). Thus the difference is non-negative, and so this alternate solution to Θ−i has either greater valuation or a shorter chain. The minimum length chain for Θ−i does not contain a downward link followed by an upward link. Proof. Suppose it does contain such a sequence. Then, some bidder i1 moved from slot i1 to slot i2 > i1, and bidder i2 moved from slot i2 to a slot i3 < i2. An alternate solution, and thus a candidate solution for Θ−i is to have bidder i1 move from slot i1 to slot i3, have bidder i2 remain in slot i2, and keep everything else the same. (Bidder i1 can move to slot i3 since i3 < i2 and i2 is in range for bidder i1 (by the fact that i1 moved to i2 in Θ−i).) The difference between the two solutions is ci2 (vi2 − vi1 ) + ci3 (vi1 − vi2 ) = (ci3 −ci2 )(vi1 −vi2 ). We know ci3 > ci2 since i3 < i2. We also know vi1 ≥ vi2 since otherwise Θ could switch bidders i1 and i2 (note again that bidder i1 can move to slot i2, since it did so inΘ−i). Thus the difference is non-negative, and so this alternate solution to Θ−i has either greater valuation or a shorter chain.
The minimum length chain for Θ−i does not contain a downward link followed by an upward link. Proof. Suppose it does contain such a sequence. Then, some bidder i1 moved from slot i1 to slot i2 > i1, and bidder i2 moved from slot i2 to a slot i3 < i2. An alternate solution, and thus a candidate solution for Θ−i is to have bidder i1 move from slot i1 to slot i3, have bidder i2 remain in slot i2, and keep everything else the same. (Bidder i1 can move to slot i3 since i3 < i2 and i2 is in range for bidder i1 (by the fact that i1 moved to i2 in Θ−i).) The difference between the two solutions is ci2 (vi2 − vi1 ) + ci3 (vi1 − vi2 ) = (ci3 −ci2 )(vi1 −vi2 ). We know ci3 > ci2 since i3 < i2. We also know vi1 ≥ vi2 since otherwise Θ could switch bidders i1 and i2 (note again that bidder i1 can move to slot i2, since it did so in Θ−i). Thus the difference is non-negative, and so this alternate solution to Θ−i has either greater valuation or a shorter chain.
The minimum length chain for Θ−i does not contain a downward link followed by an upward link. Proof. Suppose it does contain such a sequence. Then, some
bidder i1 moved from slot i1 to slot i2 > i1, and bidder i2 moved from slot i2 to a slot i3 < i2. An alternate solution, and thus a candidate solution for Θ−i is to have bidder i1 move from slot i1 to slot i3, have bidder i2 remain in slot i2, and keep everything else the same. (Bidder i1 can move to slot i3 since i3 < i2 and i2 is in range for bidder i1 (by the fact that i1 moved to i2 in Θ−i).) The difference between the two solutions is ci2 (vi2 − vi1 ) + ci3 (vi1 − vi2 ) = (ci3 −ci2 )(vi1 −vi2 ). We know ci3 > ci2 since i3 < i2. We also know vi1 ≥ vi2 since otherwise Θ could switch bidders i1 and i2 (note again that bidder i1 can move to slot i2, since it did so in Θ−i). Thus the difference is non-negative, and so this alternate solution to Θ−i has either greater valuation or a shorter chain. Edit
TutorTeddy.com & Boston Predictive Analytics
[ Email your Statistics or Math problems to help@teddycan.com (camera phone photos are OK) ]
Boston Office (Near MIT/Kendall 'T'):
Cambridge Innovation Center,
One Broadway, 14th Floor,
Cambridge, MA 02142,
Phone: 617-395-8864
Dallas Office (Near Galleria):
15950 Dallas Parkway,
Suite 400,
Dallas, TX 75248,
Phone: 866-930-6363